I’m sooo greeeeeeen
May 22nd, 2008Yikes! We are going to heat up, dry out, and turn to cosmic debris! Who you jiving with that cosmic debris? Not a day goes by that I don’t get mail telling me how wonderfully green this or that product is and encouraging me to be environmentally responsible and “go green”. Oddly, the bottom line is always some method to part me from my money. I’ve told some folks of my intention to be on the cutting edge of the next great sensational scare and cash in on millions of naive gullibles. I missed the “cell phones cause brain cancer” and the deadly, silent, mass murdering asbestos, radon, and mold. These all have the essential traits of bad science: they can’t be measured and the cause and effect relationship can’t be proved conclusively. Even eminent death by H5N1 (bird flu) lost it’s sensationalism when we realized more people are killed by out of control Russian farm tractors. And now, it looks like I have squandered global warming. All the great warming scams seem to be taken.
There is something you are not being told. This is getting out of hand and it’s time someone spoiled the fun. Odd as it may seem, I’m one of the few people in the world who have modeled radiant energy in the atmosphere and conducted empirical research to back it up. (Radiant Cooling to the Night Sky, 1982). Global warming is a function of the greenhouse effect. Here’s how it works as briefly as I can make it.
Every object radiates energy and the wavelength of that radiation depends on the temperature of the body. Hot stuff, like the sun, radiates in short wavelengths which, in the case of the sun or the very hot filament of a light bulb, or a lightening strike, our eyes can see. Cooler stuff radiates at longer wavelengths and we can’t see it. Many materials are transparent at some wavelengths and opaque at others. Glass, for example, is transparent in the visible spectrum but opaque in the 8-12 micron wavelength which is where stuff the temperature of the Earth radiate. In a greenhouse, visible light from the sun, at a short wavelength, goes right through the glass and heats up the soil and plants. The soil and plants, because of their Earthly temperature, radiate at a longer frequency and the glass is opaque at that frequency so radiant energy does not escape and the greenhouse gets hot.
Easy enough. No glass on the Earth but the atmosphere has a host of components that keep radiation from escaping. The only one we hear about is CO2. Yep, it is opaque to the critical wavelengths. Holds heat in real well. Even though CO2 levels have increased 5% over the past 10 years, there just isn’t enough of it to have much more effect than atmospheric dust. The biggest problem with CO2 is that it doesn’t correlate with temperature. That is, an increase in one does not cause a corresponding increase in the other. They are not related. Go measure it yourself. I did. Graph it and it looks like a shotgun blast. No correlation at all.
All the greenhouse gases combined, even with atmospheric dust, don’t make doodly squat difference in trapping terrestrial radiation and causing a greenhouse effect. One single chemical, all by itself, accounts for 75% of atmospheric attenuation contributing to a greenhouse effect and it correlates extremely well with surface temperature. Go measure it yourself. I have.
Before we expose the real menace to the Earth’s greenhouse effect, let’s look at what some smart people say about temperature. Not pandering politicians. Not quasi-scientist with an agenda. Not a programmed tree-hugger. Atmospheric radiant balance IS rocket science. Let’s ask a real rocket scientist. I pick Dr. Phil Chapman, M.I.T. staff physicist, NASA astronaut, and Apollo 14’s Mission Scientist. Yeah, he’ll do just fine. “Disconcerting as it may be to true believers in global warming, the average temperature on Earth has remained steady or slowly declined during the past decade, despite the continued increase in the atmospheric concentration of CO2, and now the global temperature is falling precipitously.” Chapman, and others, noticed the very close correlation with sunspot activity and terrestrial temperature. Ok, but I want to talk to the guys that actually hold the thermometers. NASA measured 2007 Arctic sea ice at 772,000 square miles more than the last three years’ average. They also measured it 4-8 inches thicker. Denmark’s Meteorological Institute stated, “We have to go back 15 years to find ice expansion so far south.” Not exactly “melting planet” rhetoric. The University of Alabama’s data from satellites launched in 1979 show a warming trend of a quarter of a degree per decade. True. But, the part the media leaves out is the next sentence: “This warmth peaked in 1998 and the temperature trend the last decade has been flat even as CO2 has increased 5.5%. Cooling began in 2002 and, over the past six years, global temperatures from satellite and land temperature gauges have cooled 0.22 degrees.” NOAA ocean buoys have recorded the same cooling since their deployment in 2003.
So, what is the single greenhouse gas that is responsible for 75% of the atmospheric greenhouse effect? Hydric acid. Dihydrous Monoxide. DHMO. Whichever name you choose to call it, the vapor form of this chemical accounts for 75% of our greenhouse effect. Go measure it yourself. I did (Proceedings - Seventh National Passive Solar Conference). It’s out of control. It now pollutes virtually every body of water on Earth and corporations continue to dump as much as they want directly into our domestic water supplies. The US military has spent billions of dollars trying to contain it. There are plans for a $54 million containment facility just 15 miles from my home. Even brief exposure to its solid form causes severe tissue damage. It is no safer in it’s liquid form; killing thousands every year and destroying acre upon acre of wetlands habitat. Ingestion symptoms include bloating, excessive urination, and vomiting. It is found in pesticides, domestic poisons, excised tumors from terminal cancer patients, and fire retardants. Al Gore says it poses no threat and does not consider it’s 75% contribution to global warming to be as significant as CO2’s 11%.